University of Idaho Social Psychology
 
 

 

Department of Psychology

  © 2010
 
University of Idaho
  All rights reserved.

  Psychology Dept.
  University of Idaho
  Design - P&D  CTI

 




 

 


 

 

Back

Transcript of Audio Lecture

Lesson six, module three.  In this lesson we’re going to talk about defending attitudes.

Let’s begin by moving to slide two.  Attitude inoculation.  This is when you allow people to practice counter-arguing or provide them with counter-arguments before they’re ever even presented to them in a real world.  DARE and America's Sex Education program tend to not do inoculation.  They used the method Just Say No or abstinence is best.  Clearly if we look at our teen pregnancy rate or the rate of STDs spreading in the US, you will find that these methods have not worked.   The problem is that we’re not matching the ABC's of peer pressure.  Even if you give students all the statistics about rate of teen pregnancy, poverty and teen mothers, drugs and academic performance, drugs and income, drugs and death, those are not going to match the ABCs that peers provide them when trying to lure them into doing things that they would not otherwise do.  For example, what you’re providing is a cognitive answer.  You’re telling students to just say no, use their knowledge, knowledge is power.  We’ve heard these things our entire lives.  Now their behavior for most of the time is going to be congruent with a don’t do it attitude.  However the affective component is very important, especially to teenagers and this is where peers make their arguments.  Don’t you want to be cool, don’t you want to fit in; it feels good.  Your parents don’t know what they’re talking about.  If they had felt this, they wouldn’t have done it, they wouldn’t have told you not to do it.  These are the ABC's of peer pressure.  Therefore, you need to do attitude inoculation, that is, providing students or children with counter-arguing skills, just saying no usually won’t cut it.  They need to be able to counter-argue at the effective basis of the attitude.

Let’s move on to slide three and discuss defending the attitude.  Some people believe in subliminal persuasion.  There’s very little evidence to support it.  It could just be mere exposure. The more you see of something, the more your attitude is shaped by that.  This is what people talk about when they discuss violence on TV or sex on TV.  You have to perceive subliminal persuasion for it to be effective.  For a long time it was thought that several liquor companies would put nude women in the drinks subliminally to persuade people, but if you don’t perceive the subliminal persuasion, it’s not going to be effective.  Placebo effects may be part of the reason that people believe that subliminal persuasion works.  For example, in one study they provided self-help tapes to several folks.  Now some people received a self-esteem tape with subliminal people underneath awareness providing them with phrases that would increase self-esteem.  Another half of the people received a memory tape that was meant to improve their memory and give them strategies for remembering better.  Half of the tapes were labeled self-esteem and half were labeled memory.  Everyone believed they were getting the self-help tapes.  Those who received a memory labeled tape and actually received the memory tapes that matched showed a slight increase in memory.  Everyone else showed no effects.  Therefore, memory was the only time that people who had a tape and label that matched is there was any evidence for what might be called subliminal persuasion.  But here perhaps people were just more likely to remember what was on the tape simply because of the content of the tape emphasizing memory.

Let’s move on to slide four, reactance theory.  We know that when freedom is limited, people perform that behavior that is being limited to reduce the sense of threat to freedom.  Pennebaker and Sanders in 1976 did a study in which they wrote on a bathroom wall, put up a sign that said do not write on these walls under any circumstances.  In other stalls they put up a sign that said please don’t write on these walls.  Upon returning several weeks later, they found that those who had read the signs please don’t write on these walls followed that.  A request is made, not a demand, and people didn’t feel it limited their freedom.  But do not write on these walls under any circumstances resulted in a great deal of graffiti.

This concludes our small discussion of defending attitudes.   Thank you.

Back