University of Idaho Psychology of Personality
Lesson 8.1: Transcript
 
Home
Syllabus
Schedule
Contact
Help

 

Register Here

Department of Psychology

  © 2008
 
University of Idaho
  All rights reserved.

  Psychology Dept.
  University of Idaho
  Design - P&D  CTI

 

 


 

 


 

 

Back

Transcript of Audio Lecture

In this lesson and in the next several lessons, we will be examining the psychoanalytic perspective pioneered by Sigmund Freud.

Slide two. The psychoanalytic model arose from some puzzles. One Freud began puzzling about in the late 1800s was: Where do your thoughts and feelings and impulses come from? Are they sometimes mysterious and confusing or disturbing? If you’re honest with yourself, you’ll recognize that you rarely if ever choose your thoughts, feelings and impulses before they happen. And indeed sometimes you will do things that will be mysterious to you, such as deciding that you’re going to simply eat one or two chips when you open a bag of chips, and then finding that you have eaten all of them. Who decided to eat the whole bag? Since it was not a conscious decision to do so, where did it come from? Sometimes you will be confusing--you’ll make up your mind that a relationship is no good for you and a few weeks later you are seeing that person again. We seem to have different feelings at different levels of awareness. Sometimes our thoughts will even be disturbing. You might find yourself having a very aggressive fantasy about your boss and be surprised and concerned that you could have such thoughts go through your mind.

Slide three. Freud’s deduction was that if you do something or think something (that is, there is a meaningful and motivated mental process, not just some random firing glitch or abnormal chemistry, and of course the vast majority of time our thoughts and feelings are meaningful) but you don’t know why you did it and you may not have had conscious control over it and you may not have even wanted to do it (as in the case of eating another chip or calling someone up you promised you wouldn’t call up) then where is that motivation coming from. If it’s not coming from the conscious mind then the motivation must be unconscious. This is Freud's fundamental deduction and, when put in this way, is quite compelling; so whereas oftentimes Freud is considered to have made strange claims, in fact many of his claims are very straightforward and reasonable.

Slide four. On the basis of this deduction, Freud argued that the mind had a topography to it. There were different regions to the mind; in particular a conscious mind, a pre-conscious mind and an unconscious mind. The conscious mind is the region that contains what is in your awareness currently. The image on the screen, the sound of my voice, these are the contents of awareness, the contents of your conscious mind. Now: what is your phone number? Well prior to my asking the question about where your phone number was, you’re unlikely to have had that in awareness. But ordinary memories—such as your phone number, address, age, and so on, are easily moved into consciousness when needed. These types of everyday knowledge are the contents of the pre-conscious. Ideally, the pre-conscious also contains much of what you’ve learned in this course; therefore, when taking an exam, you can simply draw it up into consciousness. But according to Freud, there’s a third region—the unconscious. And therein resides most of your thoughts and motives and memories and indeed all of your threatening thoughts and motives and memories get pressed down there, or more technically repressed, that is actively forbidden from awareness. But despite being forced out of awareness, they remain a powerful force exerting pressure on all aspects of psychic function. You continue to put material into your unconscious throughout life, but Freud suggested that some of the most important material was placed there early in life; specifically, some of the fundamental unconscious dynamics that shape your character throughout your life were forged during the first 5 years of life.

Slide five. Let us now consider what psychoanalysts call the stages of psychosexual development during childhood. Psychoanalytic theory states that the source of all psychic energy is the libido and the focus of your libido changes over time. Psychoanalytic theorizing stressed in particular the shifts that occur during childhood. Frustration or overindulgence of your libido at the different stages could result in fixation or regression. Fixation meant that you would get stuck at that stage. Regression would mean that under stress your personality functioning manifest qualities reminiscent of that stage. But either way your personality continues to show features of that immature stage of development. So let us now look at each of the stages of psychosexual development. Slide six. The first stage is the oral stage. This is the stage that tends to occur in infancy (the first year or so of life). For each stage we’ll also consider what is the erogenous zone, what are the fundamental underlying issues, and what fixations might occur. For the oral stage, the erogenous zone is oral, the mouth. The reason why the psychoanalysts suggested this was they observed the degree to which infants were focused on and had a lot of feelings about the process of nursing and the process of weaning. If you watch infants, they really do seem mouth focused, much to the concern of parents who are constantly having to grab things off the floor because babies, once they can move around, tend to stick everything in their mouths. So, the mouth is an important way that babies experience and interact with the world. But the larger psychological issue being played out is one of dependency and trust. As an infant, you cannot do much for yourself, so you are dependent on others, and must trust them to respond to or take care of your needs. If during this oral stage the parents, the infant’s caregivers are either too withholding of care and affection OR too indulgent of the child’s need for dependency, a fixation might develop. Sometimes the fixation leads a person to become overly needy or dependent. As an infant they felt they were never getting enough, that their caregivers were not meeting their needs; perhaps the breast kept being taken away from them when they were hungry; and consequently they feel like there is always an empty place inside themselves, they feel like they are never filled, they feel—in other words—needy and dependent. Even as adults, in each new relationship they enter into, they seek to get that nourishment, that care, that nurturing they never felt they adequately received early on during this crucial first oral stage of development. They show these needy, dependent traits throughout life because they’re stuck or fixated at this oral stage. This is called the oral dependent personality—a dependent personality whose origin was the oral stage. But sometimes this same type of oral dependency can arise from being overindulged. In this case an infant, the moment it showed the slightest distress, was immediately coddled and nursed; consequently, it feels itself to be a fragile being incapable of tolerating frustration and being independent.

But this highlights one of the complaints people have about the psychoanalytic approach: there are not clear predictions about how a particular childhood experiences lead to particular adult outcomes; since, for example, a very withholding parent or a very nurturing parent might result in the same oral dependent personality style in adulthood. This makes it very hard to test the psychoanalytic model. A further complications is that problems at the oral stage can also lead to a different type of oral personality—one characterized by mistrust, rejection, and sarcasm. That is because while some infants respond to feeling neglected and abandoned by becoming needy and clingy, others respond by getting mad. For example, some infants, when a breast is being pulled away from them, will grab on and bite--they’re responding with anger because their needs are being frustrated. If this becomes a recurring pattern, it can form part of their character structure. Believing that they their needs will not be met, they withdraw their trust; believing they will be rejected, they reject others first. Psychoanalysts suggest that sarcasm tends to go along with this oral aggressive style because it literally is form of oral aggression, and suggested by phrases like “that person has a biting wit”. Thus, a neglecting, frustrating parent can lead to either an oral-dependent personality or an oral-aggressive personality, and this makes it very hard to predict how a particular childhood experience is going to manifest itself in an adult character structure.

Slide seven. The second stage is the anal stage. It tends to appear during the toddler years, ages two to four, during which the erogenous zone shifts from the mouth to the anus, and the most stressful issue shifts from weaning to toilet training. The larger issue that surrounds the toilet training is autonomy: Can you do things on your own, can you control yourself, and can you accept some social control, meaning doing things when, where, and how society expects you to. Toilet training is just one of the early domains in which a child is asked to conform to a set of social norms.

At this stage again fixations can occur. Perhaps the child is punished and made to feel ashamed if they have potty accidents. As a result, they may respond by getting mad and feeling, in essence: “Hey authority figures! You’re telling me when and where to use the potty? Ha! Well I’m gonna do what I want. I’m gonna have potty accidents just to show you. Yeah, because it’s not me who’s bad, it’s your stupid rules that are bad.” If this attitude becomes their way of coping with and defending against the potential humiliation of not being able to meet a social norm, then it can form part of their character. That is, they get fixated at this angry toddler stage and throughout their life tend to be a disorderly, rebellious, angry individual. Now in adulthood, the person may sound more reasonable, saying: “Here are the reasons why these rules are stupid or beneath me”. But the psychoanalyst would suggest that basic feeling or attitude of rejecting rules arises from an fear of feeling inadequate, ashamed, humiliated, bad if one were held up to those standards, and that unconscious inarticulate fear comes from those early humiliations concerning toilet training during the anal stage.

However, another way to cope with the potential humiliation that comes from being in the wrong is to go the other direction, to become extremely concerned with being perfect—being clean, neat, orderly—and this is known as the anal compulsive personality style. Indeed, the phrase “that person’s really anal” has become part of everyday speech, and refers to a person who, in psychoanalytic terms, is fixated at the anal stage, who is overly concerned about being the "good boy" or "good girl" (as their parents might have said to them when they used the potty correctly) and not being the “bad boy” or “bad girl” (as their parents might have said to them when they when they had an accident). The psychoanalysts have identified a number of traits that seem to be part of this anal-compulsive personality style, such a stinginess. According to the psychoanalyst, the anal-compulsive individual learned to hang onto their feces until just the right moment, and now, in adulthood, have generalized that attitude to hanging onto to their money and possessions, and so appear stingy or miserly.

Slide eight. As we move into the preschool years, ages three to six, we move into the phallic stage. In this stage, the erogenous zone shifts from the anus to the genitals and the child begins to feel the first stirrings of sexual interest in others, which may lead to a complex family drama—at least within the head of the child—called the oedipus complex. While there is some research support for the oral and anal stages and the fixations associated with those stages, there is no research support for the psychoanalytic theory of what’s going on during the phallic stage. So, while I will describe the theory because it is so famous and so often mentioned in the wider culture, you should take it with a grain of salt. In any case, the theory states that as the child feels those stirrings of desire, the focus of that desire becomes the opposite sex parent, so boys will begin to feel some attraction towards their mother, and girls will feel some attraction towards their father. But there’s a problem: The same sex parents already has an exclusive and intimate relationship with the object of their desire. This makes them mad, even hateful towards the same sex parent. The boys become resentful of their fathers; the girls become resentful of their mothers. But now that they are rivals of their same sex parent, they worry that the same sex parents will do something to get them out of the picture so they also become fearful of the same sex parent. So they trapped in this family crucible of desire, hate, and fear. This stressful state cannot continue. The resolution for the child to identify with the same sex parent. A boy concludes: I can’t have mom right now, but if I grow up to be like dad, I’ll be able to have somebody like mom. A girl concludes: I can’t have dad right now, but if I grow up to be someone like my mom, I can have someone like my dad. So basically they decide if you can’t fight ‘em, join ‘em; that is, I’ll become like the same sex parent and eventually be able to have the type of intimate relationship that they currently enjoy.

Psychoanalysts suggest that if you don’t resolve adequately these oedipal issues, these competitive feelings with your same sex parent, you might become fixated on these issues, and spend your life feeling competitive and playing power games, especially with same sex others and especially when it comes to competing for attention from opposite sex others. You may also feel unresolved feelings of guilt, especially guilt in the context of sexuality, because your first sexual feelings are associated with your parents—that is, they were incestuous feelings.

Slide nine. As we move into the elementary school and pre-puberty years, which psychoanalysts call the latency stage, the libido, and especially the bodily expressions of libido associated with the preceding stages, become repressed. Instead, the libido is re-directed towards mastering social and cognitive skills. The demands society places on children, especially those entering formal schooling as in the United States, focuses their energy on learning these basic skills: reading, writing, arithmetic, social skills, athletic skills, and so on; and the issues that were focal during those first five years, during the oral, anal and phallic stage become repressed and increasingly hidden from memory until, in adulthood, it takes years of psychoanalysis to rediscover the thoughts and feelings and urges that you had during those emotional, conflictual first five years.

Slide 10. The final, genital stage of psychosexual development is triggered by the onset of puberty. As people enter their teenage years the libido once again stirs in a way that cannot be completely repressed and again the focus of the libido, as in the phallic stage, is the genitals, but now the energy is focused outside the family towards relationships with peers. Some of the issues that arise at this stage and that continue throughout life include: how to control libido and express that energy in a mature way through our love and our work. The people that we love and the tasks that we engage in ideally will be opportunities for experiencing intrinsic enjoyment and for making a meaningful contribution, but this depends on our not having unfulfilled oral, anal or phallic needs. To the extent that we are fixated at those earlier stages, that we have unresolved issues, then we will experience the people we encounter as adults as objects for fulfilling those needs. If we have unresolved oral issues, then others will be viewed only with respect to how they might take care of us or how they might reject us; if we have unresolved anal issues, then we will be too tightly controlled or rule-governed to form flexible and mutual relationships; if we have unresolved phallic issues, we will be overly competitive or guilty. On the other hand, if our earlier experiences allowed us to resolve the issues associated with each stage of psychosexual development in an appropriate way, then as we meet new situations in life, rather than projecting unfilled needs onto them, we can see them more as they really are.

Back