English Utilitarianism:
James Mill, Jeremy Bentham, J. S. Mill

      John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)

      Major works: On Liberty (1859); On Utilitarianism (1861); The Subjection of Women (1869).

      Gertrude Himmelfarb, On Liberty and Liberalism

       

      Bentham’s  Quantitative Utilitarianism

      Bentham emphasizes.

      Bentham:  "Others things being equal, pushpin is as good as poetry.”

      National gladiator contests?

      Qualitative utilitarianism:

 

 

Utilitarianism: Hedonism + Consequentialism

      Psychological Hedonism. 

      Ethical Hedonism

      Egoistic Hedonism:

      Nonegoistic Hedonism. 

       

      Bentham’s hedonic calculus

      Six criteria for individual actions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Seventh criterion of “extent”.

 

A poem in honor
of the hedonic calculus

      Intense, long, certain, speedy, fruitful, pure

      Such marks in pleasures and in pains endure.

      Such pleasures seek if private be thy end.

      If it be public, wide let them extend.

      Such pains avoid, whichever be thy view:

      If pains must come, let them extend to few.

 

Should Uncle Jeremy take Johnny Stuart to the circus or stay home and read a book?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Utilitarianism is a nutshell

      "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness [i.e., pleasure], wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness [i.e., pain]. 

      "All things desirable. . . are desirable either for the pleasure inherent in themselves, or as means to the promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain."

 

Misunderstanding hedonism

      Is utilitarianism “swinish.”

      "Their god is in their belly" (Phillip. 3:19).  See “Paul and Epicurus” on website.

      Mill agrees with Epicurus: "Human beings have faculties more elevated than animal appetites. . . ."

 

Mill’s wager

      A quick proof of qualitative utilitarianism: Would you rather be a pig satisfied or a human dissatisfied?

      Some high quality pleasures

       

      A critique

      Is Mill doing what Epicurus did?

      He admits that he is using

      If so, then he is a

      Quantitative hedonism wins but also loses?

 

Mill’s eclecticism

      Some Stoics and Christian "elements" need to be included  in order to "reform" the theory.

      Does not this make utilitarian theory incoherent?

      The Epicureans would

 

Pleasure and intrinsic value

      Mill implies that higher pleasures

      Previous utilitarians saw the superiority of intellectual pleasures

      Does not utility require this? 

      All pleasure, higher or lower,

      Quantitative hedonism wins again?

       

      Rule vs. Act Utilitarianism

      Do we have to do the hedonic calculus for every single act

      Mill: “competent judges” have already done the basic calculations

      Since the basic rules are already laid down,

       

Principle of utility restated

      Mill's nonegoism:  "Not the agent's own greatest happiness, but the greatest amount of happiness altogether.” (p. 179)

      “The ultimate end, with reference to and for the sake of which all other things are desirable (whether we are considering our own good or that of other people) is an existence exempt as far as possible from pain, and as rich as possible in enjoyments, both in quantity and quality.”

      ”Extent" means all "sentient creation.”

 

What kind of happiness?

      Mill does not mean a "life of rapture.”

      Balance of tranquility and excitement.

      Intellectual cultivation is

      Mill chooses Bentham’s criteria of

       

           Christian ethics and utility

      "In the golden rule of Jesus of Nazareth, we read the complete spirit of the ethics of utility.  To do as one would be done by, and to love one's neighbor as oneself, constitute the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality.”

      Was Jesus a utilitarian? Was he a hedonist?

      Mill and Scriven on agapeism

      Rational vs. theological agapeism.

 

Social or Welfare Utilitarianism

      “Laws and social arrangements should place happiness, or. . . the interest of the individual as nearly as possible in harmony with the interest of the whole. . . .” 

      Libertarianism: we must pursue our own self-interest and

      Total free market vs. “mixed economy” for social utilitarianism.

 

Mill: Liberty or Utility?

      Highest value is personal liberty

      Highest value is pleasure.

 

Mill: Liberty or Utility?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liberty and Utility

      Mill in On Liberty: “Maximizing liberty always maximizes utility.”

      Anabaptist martyrs in Europe.

      The Nazis marching in Skokie, Illinois.

      Long term utility of liberty will

 

Classical Conservatism

      Plato, Aristotle,  the Roman Stoics. 

      Medieval Christianity and pre-revolutionary Europe

      Universal moral law and.

      Stoic view of.

 

 

 

Classical liberalism

      Kant, Locke, American Founding Fathers.

      Universal moral

      No divine right of kings. 

      Ethical objectivism in most of these figures.

      But also an incipient

       

      We are all liberals!

      Liberalis:.

      Motto of the French Revolution

      Liberi  vs. servi is dissolved.

      Today’s libertarians take

      Today’s liberals emphasize

      Today’s conservatives  focus

       

      Libertarianism

      J.S. Mill of On Liberty and  American Libertarian Party.  “Night Watchman State.”

      No universal moral laws,

      No laws except those related to

      Legalization of

Social utilitarianism

      Jeremy Bentham, James Mill, J. S. Mill's other works.

      “Welfare liberalism"

       No universal moral laws,

      “Greatest good for the greatest number.”

      Liberty may be sacrificed.

 

Bentham: liberty & rights

      In Principles of Morals and Legislation liberty.

       "Bentham himself had utter contempt for the idea of liberty" (Himmelfarb)

      "Deprivation of freedom does not appears on his list of pains" (Warnock)  

      There are no natural rights.

      Rights come at the end of.

 

 

 

A burning house

      A house in burning and three children are inside.

      The following people are present: the fire chief, a utilitarian, a Kantian, and unknown person.

      After the first three decide that they have no moral obligation to act, the fourth person runs in and saves the children.

      A follower of the DDE comes on the scene and declares what she would have done.