Article 6 - Tenure & Prom.

University of Idaho

Dept. of English
University of Idaho
P.O. Box 441102
Moscow, ID 83844-1102

 

BYLAWS OF THE FACULTY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH

[Amended April and September 2003]

ARTICLE 6.  TENURE, PROMOTION, AND REVIEW

Section 6.1.  Departmental Jurisdiction.  The English Department has initial jurisdiction over tenure, promotion, and retention decisions; final decisions rest ultimately with the dean and the president.  Each department within the college has the authority to make recommendations which play a major role in such decisions.

Section 6.2.  Tenure.

A.     Criteria for making tenure decisions will be established by the tenured faculty of the department, and these standards will be made known to the entire English faculty and to the Tenure Recommending and Competency Review Committee.

B.     Departmental tenure recommendations are made and competency reviews are carried out in accordance with the procedures outlined in Appendix 1 ("Department of English:  Tenure Recommending and Competency Review Committee" [adopted May, 1974 ]).

Section 6.3.  Promotion.

A.     Recommendation for consideration for promotion will come from the departmental chair, but a faculty member may himself/herself request consideration for promotion.  In keeping with university policy, final departmental recommendations will be determined in the following manner:

(1)    full professors will make recommendations for associate professors being considered for promotion;

(2)    full professors and associate professors will make recommendations for assistant professors being considered for promotion; full professors, associate professors, and assistant professors will make recommendations for instructors being considered for promotion.

B.     The criteria for promotion are the same as those used in tenure decisions, with the qualification that the higher rank, the more evidence of scholarly activity required for promotion.  The department recognizes that early consideration for promotion in cases of outstanding academic performance is desirable. 

Section 6.4.  Three-Year Review.  The tenured faculty of the department will conduct a routine "three-year review" of all untenured assistant professors in the faculty member's third year.  The purpose of this review is (1) to give the faculty member an early indication of his/her potential for tenure; (2) to remind the faculty member of the criteria on which tenure and promotion decisions are normally based, and to inform him/her of any other circumstances which might affect a decision in his/her case; (3) to inform the faculty member of any deficiencies which might lead to a non-recommendation of tenure and to make suggestions, when appropriate, for correcting them; or (4) to recommend non-reappointment.  This will not be interpreted to mean that a faculty member's contract cannot be terminated before the end of the third year, since all non-tenured appointments at the university are for one year. 

Section 6.5.  ABDs.  A qualification for the rank of assistant professor will be completion of the Ph.D. or M.F.A..  If an assistant professor is hired without the Ph.D. or M.F.A., he/she will have one academic year in which to complete it.

 

Back General Information Faculty Teaching Assistants Writing Center Public Readings Nixon Institute Scholarships Fugue Magazine Banks Awards WebCT