Midterm do-at-home mini-essay, Core 127-01.
Bring one single-spaced, one-sided sheet with you to
Wednesday’s exam, responding to the questions below.
This essay is worth 25% of your exam grade.
From Chapter 3 of Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents:
“Human life in common is only made possible when a majority
comes together which is stronger than any separate individual and which remains
united against all separate individuals.
The power of this community is then set up as ‘right’ in opposition to
the power of the individual, which is condemned as ‘brute force.’
This replacement of the power of the individual by the power of a
community constitutes the decisive step of civilization.
The essence of it lies in the fact that the numbers of the community
restrict themselves in their possibilities of satisfaction, whereas the
individual knew no such restrictions.
The first requisite of civilization, therefore, is that of justice—that
is, the assurance that a law once made will not be broken in favour of an
individual. This implies nothing as
to the ethical value of such a law.
The further course of cultural development seems to tend towards making the law
no longer an expression of the will of a small community—a caste or stratum of
the population or a racial group—which, in its turn, behaves like a violent
individual towards other, and perhaps more numerous, collections of people.
The final outcome should be a rule of law to which all—except those who
are not capable of entering a community—have contributed by a sacrifice of their
instincts, and which leaves no one—again with the same exception—at the mercy of
brute force.”
a) In this discussion of individual rights vs. community authority, where would you say Freud’s sympathies lie—individual or community? What evidence can you bring to support your opinion (from this passage and from other sections of the book)?
b) In the second chapter of his book, (“Einstein’s Question”), David L. Smith invokes Freud in his discussion of the idea that war may be “natural.” How does that discussion connect with the ideas expressed in the passage above?
MIDTERM EXAMINATION, CORE
127-01: WAR AND OUR WORLD. 15
OCTOBER 2008
NAME_____________________________________________
Passage identification and
interrogation. From subject matter
and prose style, identify the authors of the following passages and answer the
questions regarding content. Each
is worth 10 points; total 60.
1.
“It seemed a little crazy to
be living in a hotel, like a hotel in Des Moines or New Orleans, with a lobby
and wicker chairs in the lounge, and signs on the door of your room telling you
that they would press your clothes immediately and that meals served privately
cost ten per cent more and meantime it was like a trench when they lay down an
artillery barrage. The whole place
trembled to the explosion of shells.”
a)
Author?
b)
What makes this paragraph an
effective piece of writing?
c)
Name the conflict that gave
rise to this essay.
2.
“Clearly, all three of these
key factors—the politics of oil security, the dynamics of demand and supply, and
the constraints of geography—will play a significant role in determining the
likelihood and location of future conflict over oil.”
a)
Author?
b)
What “constraints of
geography” is the author referring to?
c)
Why was 1912 a critical
turning point in the conflict referred to above?
d)
What was the effect of the
October 1973 Arab-Israeli conflict on the perception of oil as a strategic
commodity?
→
3.
“Rejection of mass bombing as
an acceptable instrument of war, and of the idea that civilians were legitimate
targets, coincided with a shift in doctrinal preferences within air forces
themselves. Since with modern
high-cost technology no air force other than the American and Soviet could
afford a large bomber force, mass bombing was no longer a serious strategic
option.”
a)
Author?
b)
At roughly what point in the
20th century did this attitudinal shift take place, and what gave
rise to it (a reason other than expense)?
c)
How is air warfare currently
pursued, according to this article?
(Do we still use bombs?)
4.
“We should start with the
assumption that everything about the United States, like everything about any
country, needs to be examined and assessed. That is what it means to be a moral
person. There is much about this country
a citizen can be proud of, and I am in fact proud of those things. The personal
freedoms guaranteed (to most people) in this culture, for example, are quite
amazing. As someone who regularly tries to use those freedoms, I am as aware as
anyone of how precious they are.”
a)
Author?
b)
What particular “freedom” is
most pertinent in relation to this essay?
Why?
c)
Speculate about why the
author might have included the paragraph quoted here.
5.
“Should students
be forced to take courses in American history, and if so, what should those
courses contain? Should they be forced to learn a foreign language, encounter a
laboratory science, master calculus, study grammar at the expense of creative
writing (or the reverse), read Plato or Shakespeare or Marx or Darwin? Should
they be required to take courses that foster ethnic and racial tolerance?”
a)
Author?
b)
What is the
current University of Idaho response to these kinds of questions?
→
c)
The author (as
you no doubt remember) chooses instead to “describe the qualities of the human
beings we would like that curriculum to produce.”
Name THREE of the proposed desirable qualities.
6.
“Christianity,
along with other influences, changed fundamental aspects of Nez Perce society.
Because of the geographic focus of the early proselytizers, not all Nez Perces
received equal attention in the acculturation process. The buffalo-hunting
proclivities of some bands fostered a cultural exclusiveness that removed them
from sustained missionary attention.”
a)
Author?
b)
When did
Christianity come to the Nez Perce bands, and where, and through whom?
c)
Explain the last
sentence in the passage above.
d)
What would you
say is the tribe’s sense of the most
important event during the 1877 contest?
Why?
Briefly identify the following terms/people.
2 points each; total 10.
Condor Legion
“blood diamonds”
Carter Doctrine
Falkland Islands
Ayatollah Khomeini
→
Imagine that I’m blind.
Explain Picasso’s Guernica to
me, including information about how it came to be and what happened to it when
it was completed. 5 points.