|
























| |
Parking
Deng Chau
Larc: 359-01
Date: 9-13-2004


Different type of parking lot element in the design of U.S. Cities an town. |
Background
Parking lots have long been a major element in the
design of U.S. cities and towns. While it may not be true that the
United States is turning into one enormous parking lot, there are times
when this would appear to be the case. The popularity of the automobile
as the preferred mode of transportation and the spread of industry and
commerce away from the central city have combined to increase the number
and size of parking lots. The suburban shopping mall and
industrial park, surrounded by a sea of automobiles, are a very familiar
part of the contemporary American landscape.
The Public Benefits of Parking Lot
Parking lot landscaping needs to he encourage because it enhances the
visual environment; promotes public safety; moderates heat, wind and other
local climatic effects produced by parking lots; and minimizes nuisances, primarily
nose and glare. Because a properly landscaped lot can provided these
public benefits, planners are legally justified in imposing landscaping
regulations. |
|



Hedges can guide automobiles and pedestrians. |
Public Safety
Landscaping provision can be used to enhance the safety of parking lots
by guiding the circulation of cars and people and by ensuring that the
drive's vision is unobstructed.
Landscaping can be used to control access to parking lots, to make
traffic diverter prominent, and to direct the flow of traffic within the
lot. When planted next to highway or in median strips, trees and
shrubs can form an effective crash barrier. Plants with thorns or needles,
such as conifers are particularly effective in controlling pedestrian
traffic.
By varying the species, height, and location of landscaping, the relative
important of streets can be defined . For example, plants of similar height
might abut major highways, while plants of variable heights and less density
might be used a long minor streets. Landscaping that serves a
primarily aesthetic purpose can also be sued to promote safety by
controlling views and by defining spaces, which, in turn, can influence
traffic movements. Because improper landscaping can block sigh line s
landscaping regulations frequently required that property owners limit the
height of planting at intersections to make it easy to see oncoming traffic
and pedestrians. The oncoming traffic; the higher the speed ,
the more time a driver needs to see oncoming cars or pedestrians. |


Heavy planting, at the edge of the parking lot gives softening and
cooling effect during the summer when the trees are in leaf. |
Microclimate
Everyone has felt oppressive heat reflected from an un landscaped parking
lot on a summer day. Plants can have a significant moderating effect
on the heat and other uncomfortable aspects o the microclimate of parking
lots. The water released from plants by transpiration and evaporation
reduces high daytime temperatures, as does the absorption or reflection of
solar radiation by leaves. At night the heat that has absorbed is
released of the lot has shaded by plants, less heat is slowly,
moderating evening temperatures, and, since some of the lot has been shaded
by plants, less heat is released by the paved surface at night. The
amount of temperature and modification plants can provide depends to some
extend an small trees more effectively moderates summer temperatures than
does a planting of small ornamentals because of the multiple canopy provided
by the diverse planting. |



Some landscaping of parking lot can be used as buffer for adjacent
streets and building to reduce nose and glare.
|
Minimizing Nuisances-Noise and Glare
Landscaping of parking lots can be used as a buffer for adjacent streets
and buildings, reducing glare and noise. Some people also feel that a
landscaped buffer reduces vandalism of vehicles.
since plants and trees absorb sunlight and provide shade glare is reduced
by landscaping. Glare can come from primary sources, such as the sun or
street lights, or from reflections form the surfaces of automobiles.
To minimize glare, landscaping must be place between the viewer and it
sources. Plants might be selected on the basis of such characteristic as
height and density at both their immature and mature stages of development.
Daily and seasonal variation s also must be considered to obtain the desired
results. A lack of glare is particularly critical to safe driving.,
and, thus it is an important factor in landscaping around parking lots
and roads. |
|


Some parking lot has more landscape than the other. It is depend on
where the designer design and the location of it. |
Amount and Location of Landscaping
The amount of landscaping needed to improve
parking lots is difficult to estimate,. hat is the minimum amount of
landscaping needed to screen parking from adjacent to residences? How much
is needed to enhance the general environment of the parking lot itself?
There are no easy answers. When ASPO published the original
report, Parking Lot Aesthetic, it was suggested that minimum of 10 percent
of the area be used for landscaping. This percentage was, and still is
a, a generally does not provide enough area for landscaping to be
effective, so many communities still use this general rule and a recent
report by New Jersey Department of Community Affairs recommends it as a
minimum. |

 |
Possible of Treatment of Parking Lots Edges
The three basic materials that can be used to screen parking are
vegetation, earth and structures. The character of the area, adjacent
land use, depth of setback available and cost are all determinant and
appropriate solution
|


Trees and shrubs are planting along the parking lot. |
Planting
Rapid growing vine and climbing shrubs can planted on fencing where no
set back is possible. Boston Ivy or Virgin creeper will the give the most
rapid coverage, though they lose their leave in the winter. Firethorn
or varieties of Euonymus are evergreen plant that will provide all
year-round screening.
Hedge maybe use d to good advantage when a narrow setback is possible.
California privet is a very successful deciduous hedge plant, but require s
more trimming that evergreens such as Japanese Holly or Upright Yew.
The height should be be a minimum of 6'.
Flowering trees can be used in conjunction with a low hedge where a the
depth allows. Trees such as crabapple magnolia and Hawthorne would provide
screening and are adaptable to city conditions. |

The shrubs and plants are growing along the parking lot make it as a screen. |
Earth
By combining earth and mounding with low retaining wall screening can be
achieve in a a limited space where it would not be desirable to cut off the
distant view. Rip rap, sloped paving or a battered dry wall a re
alternatives when they setback is slightly deeper. Earth mounds alone
may be used if a depth of 40' is available. Lawn can be easily
maintained on slopes up to 3: 1, however ground cover s such as Ivy or
Pachysandra on steeper slopes (up to 2:1) would but down maintenance. |
|

The retaining wall of the parking lot is the most positive solution to
screening the parking. |
Structure
The most positive solution to screening parking would be the construction
of a brick or other suitable masonry wall. The minimum height should
be six feet. Periodic openings with panels of wrought iron fencing
would allow surveillance from the outside. Pedestrian greenways and
small sitting areas could be provided where the street right-of-way width
permits.
In commercial areas, a narrow band of small shops would both screen the
parking and provide shopping continuity. Careful design control would
have to be exercised in this situation. |
| |
Vehicular Circulation and Parking
Vehicular circulation and parking are important site
planning issues combining both function and aesthetics. The impact of
automobiles, roadways and parking on the creation of livable cities and
towns has been negative. Careful planning and site design can mitigate the
damage to the physical landscape while permitting the freedom of access that
Americans have come to expect.
While automobile access has been emphasized for the last 50
years, pedestrian and bicycle access has been eroded.
|

Austin 2004
Road Hierarchy Table |
Road Hierarchy Table
The table provided here is a reference for street width and
travel speed. Transportation planners typically establish a hierarchy of
roads depending on the speed and amount of traffic. The use of collectors
and arterials to move traffic through residential neighborhoods has come
into question. Traditional street design dispersed traffic throughout the
grid of local streets rather than funneling them to collectors and
arterials. This pattern seems to favor the pedestrian by limiting the
number of high speed, high volume roads. |

Austin 2004
Rural Freeway Cross Section

Austin 2004
Major Arterials

Austin 2004
Depressed Expressway

Austin 2004
Roadway at Flood Plain |
Roadway
This section illustrates the use of low speed frontage roads adjacent to
higher speed and high volume arterials. Notice that berming for sound
and visual screening is provided for. Note also, that storm water
runoff from the highway is directed into a vegetated median where it can
infiltrate into the soil.
In this section the lane and median widths for an arterial road are
shown. The planted median limits the problem of glare from on-coming
traffic.
The change of grade, speed and number of lanes in the depressed
expressway effectively isolates parts of a city in order to move large
volumes of traffic through.
Preservation of indigenous vegetation is important especially when the
road is within a flood plain. Minimizing the earthwork in the median is the
point of this illustration. |
| |
|
| |
Traffic Volume
The volume of traffic expected as the result of new development can be
estimated by considering the typical driving habits of Americans. The
typical single family detached residential unit generates an average of 10
vehicular trips per day. Low rise apartments generate 5.4 units per day
while high rise apartments generate 4.3 trips.
This suggests that a high density and mix of residential and retail uses
can significantly reduce the amount of traffic generated in an urban area.
Loop roads and cul-de-sac streets that are 20'-26' wide can accommodate
2,500 trips per day at speeds of 25 mph. Minor connectors (local streets)
that are 20'-24' wide can carry 1,500 trips per day.
Lane widths range from 12' to 10' depending on the speed and volume of
traffic. Parallel parking should be 22'x8'.
|

Austin 2004
Existing Highway

Austin 2004
Photo Simulation |
Multi-Functional Spaces
As towns and neighborhoods develop, we sometimes forget that streets are
more than conduits for cars. They are multi-functional spaces that need to
be enclosed as corridors and furnished to support their many uses. In the
top image, a state highway makes its unattractive entry into the town of
McCall, Idaho. The absence of sidewalks, curbs and plantings make this
street a desolate place. Notice also, that the buildings are held away from
the street by undefined parking lots.
The second image is a photo simulation showing the effect of trees,
parallel parking and curbs. The pedestrian is protected by each of these
elements. Cars turning into parking area must use access ramps, reducing
the number of pedestrian-vehicle conflict areas. Parallel parking spaces
should be 22' to 24' long and 7' to 8' wide. A 28' wide road will
accommodate parallel parking on one side. Since the driver opens the door
into the traffic lane, this is a dangerous parking method.
|

Austin 2004
Parking

Austin 2004
Traditional Parking |
Parking
Vehicles vary in size but autos are generally 16' long and 6' wide. Some
vehicles on the market today are somewhat shorter and longer and wider
In this image, you can see that cars pull into angled spaces. As with
parallel parking there is no aisle. Cars pull into the traffic lane. This
is a safer situation than parallel parking. Any angle is acceptable for
pull in parking. 9' x 18' is necessary for perpendicular spaces.
Angled parking along the street is a pattern of small towns across
America. This method provides a large number of parking spaces adjacent to
the businesses and reduces the need for large parking lots. This parking
and road pattern also greatly reduces traffic speed which is appropriate for
a central business district. In this image, a central business street has
angled parking on one side of the street and parallel parking on the other.
This arrangement compensates for a right-of-way that is too narrow to
accommodate angled parking on each side. However, both arrangements provide
the pedestrian with a protective buffer from the moving cars.
|

Austin 2004
Curbside Lot |
Curbside Lot
The site planning mistake of the 1960's and 70's was replacing angled
on-street parking with large parking lots in front of the business. This
moved the building back from the sidewalk and discouraged pedestrian flow in
favor of higher speed vehicular traffic. A better solution is to place the
building at or near the sidewalk edge and place the parking at the rear of
the building.
In this image, you can see some other problems. Reflected heat and glare
are unpleasant characteristics of the poorly design parking lot. Enamel
paint, chrome and glass reflect sunlight into the eyes of pedestrians
walking past or through the lot.
|

Austin 2004
Corner Parking Lot |
Corner Parking Lot
The lower image shows a poor planning practice and a poorly designed
parking area. The intersection corners of central business districts should
be reserved for buildings that contribute to the character of the
neighborhood or the development of pedestrian spaces. The arrangement shown
creates an unattractive urban image as well as an inconvenient or hazardous
parking situation. |

Austin 2004
Aisles and Stalls

Austin 2004

Austin 2004

Austin 2004

Austin2004

Austin 2004 |
Aisles and Stalls
Dividing very large lots into smaller "rooms" separated by planted
buffers makes parking lots more visually acceptable and reduces their
scale. Planted islands have been included in this lot to enhance its
character.
Asphalt absorbs a great deal of heat. When the material is heated to
above the temperature of the air, the asphalt radiates heat to the air. A
combination of direct solar radiation and long wave radiation from the
asphalt can create a stifling environment in the summer. A goal of shade
over at least 50% of the asphalt at noon in the summer has been adopted by
some municipalities as a minimum design standard. You can see that the lot
illustrated here does not meet that standard.
Adding a 5' extension to the dead end part of the lot helps the last two
space gain an exit without backing out of the lot. Late comers to a full
lot still have to back out into the road.
This "hammer head" design solves the problem of late comers having to
back out of the lot, however, there are 6 fewer space than in the dead end
lot.
Here are two alternative designs for flow through lots. On the left is
the lot typical of small shopping centers. It preserves a fire lane near
the building.
Placing planting beds at the end of the parking bays and between them can
transform the visual character of a parking lot. In these images, shrubs
such as, Burning Bush, Oregon Grape and Junipers, are planted in curbed
planters. Plants on the end of the parking bays should not grow taller than
4 feet to preserve the driver's sight lines. However, even these low
plantings screen the parked cars substantially.
Due to the bumper overhang a median of 8 to 12 feet is needed to provide
space for planting, lighting, infiltration beds or walkways. Deciduous
trees spaced 20' to 40' apart between the bays and in the end islands shade
the lot in summer and let light through to melt snow in winter.
A full size car has a turning radius of 20' and bus requires about 25'.
This results in a cul-de-sac that is at least 100' wide |

Austin 2004

Austin 2004
Angled parking

Austin 2004

Austin 2004

Austin 2004

Parking Aisles and Stall Dimension |
Angled Parking
Comparisons of perpendicular and angled parking reveal that more area is
required for the angled system but more interior planting area is generated.
Angled spaces are easier for the driver to enter and exit. In second
image you can see the raised island between two rows of spaces. With a
little more width this strip could have served as a walkway to the building
out of the driving area.
One way angled parking is advantageous since the travel aisle can be
narrow. Two way angled parking encourages drivers to turn left into a bay,
pull through and park facing the aisle. Angled parking is designed for all
parking to occur to the driver's right
These images show the dimensions required for 45 degree angled one-way
parking. Notice the overlap required where rows of spaces meet.

This lot pattern and dimensions are required when a parking
lot is on land that slopes more that 4% or 5%. A steep grade can occur in
the median allowing for flatter aisles and parking spaces. Notice in this
scheme, the width for the pairs of bays is 50'
60 degree parking is the most common type of angled
parking. In this plan the curb to curb dimension assumes that a bumper
overhang is available. The longer dimension (wall to wall) is based on no
bumper overhang.
A typical parking space is 18' by 9' and small car spaces
are 16' x 8'. Most cities and towns permit a certain percentage of small
car spaces in parking lots. This plan and table provide the dimensions of
the parking lot elements for three alternative stall orientations. Study
the names and typical dimensions of each parking lot element. |

Austin 2004
Parking and run off

|
Parking and Storm Water
Since standard asphalt is impervious, rainwater runs off at a rate far
more rapid and in greater quantities than under pre-development conditions.
Furthermore, run off from streets and parking lots is contaminated with a
variety of chemicals including hydrocarbons and heavy metals. It is
desirable to clean this toxic water as much as possible before it reaches
the natural environment. Vegetated swales and detention basins in parking
lots have proven effective in removing pollutants from storm water run off.
The parking lot design shown here is of the University of Idaho Sweet
Avenue parcel. It is different than what was installed but has many
features to recommend it as an ideal design (Kaori Yoshida, designer).
The large lot is divided into smaller spaces. Unit pavers on sand is
used for the parking bays and porous asphalt is specified for the aisles.
These paving systems are permeable and greatly reduce runoff. Runoff which
does occur is directed toward swales and detention basins where it
infiltrates in to the soil.
|
References
Corwin A. Margaret. Parking Lot Landscaping.
American Society of Planning
Officials: Chicago, 1978.
Robinnette O. Gary. Parking Lot Landscape
Development. Environmental Desig
n Press: Virginia, 1976.
http://www.class.uidaho.edu/larc383/outlines/circulationOutline.htm
http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/ID/Caldwell/13007000000009000.htm
http://www.asphaltisbest.com/PDFs/CHAPTER4.PDF
http://www.bg.grounds-mag.com/arc/grounds_maintenance_design_functional_attractive/ |