Thematic Paper (1)
Home Up Syllabus (PNW) Graduate Syllabi (PNW) Thematic Paper (1) Revised Schedule

 

 

First Thematic Paper

 

You will be turning in your first thematic paper soon. This is a reminder of what my expectations are.

 

You should choose one theme from those provided on the syllabus. From that theme, you should choose one or a few related questions to answer. You should, of course, choose a question(s) that you can answer given the material we have investigated so far. In answering those questions, you should encompass as much of the reading and lecture material as possible covering the class from the beginning until the paper is due. You need to answer it with a specific, argumentative thesis. Spend some time contemplating this aspect of your paper, as it is crucial to have a strong thesis to organize your thoughts. You should then support your thesis with specific evidence drawn from our discussions and readings, as well as lectures.

 

I am happy to talk with you about your papers and will read drafts if you give them to me with enough time.

 

Specifications

bullet

6 pages for undergraduate students; 8 pages for graduate students.

bullet

Typed and double spaced.

bullet

Include a thesis statement, preferably in the introduction, that answers the question. Please underline, italicize, or bold your thesis statement.

bullet

Whenever you quote or paraphrase an idea from others, provide a footnote. Historians use the Chicago Manual of Style for footnotes. Please use it for this paper. Samples are available at: http://www.dianahacker.com/resdoc/history/bibliography.html. (Use the note format, not the bibliography format. You will need to use styles #1 and 11 for the books you have consulted to this point. See http://www.dianahacker.com/resdoc/history/footnotes.html for an explanation for subsequent citations. If you have questions, see me.

bullet

You should draw from all relevant readings, discussions, and lectures.

bullet

Please read my Writing Hints handout before turning in your paper. It can be found online at: http://www.class.uidaho.edu/asowards/writing_hints.htm.

bullet

Due: Thursday, February 26, 2004 in class; reminder that you must be in class for your paper to count as on time.

 

A Word about Grades

I have adopted the following grade guide from a former professor of mine. It approximates my sense of grades.

 

A.      An "A" paper is one that is good enough to be read aloud in class. It is clearly written and well-organized. Most importantly it contains a perceptive, original, central argument supported by a well-chosen variety of specific examples. It demonstrates that the writer has grappled with the issues raised in the course, synthesized the readings, discussions, and lectures, and formulated a compelling, independent argument.

 

B.      A typical "B" paper is a solid work containing flashes of insight that demonstrate that the writer has wrestled with some of the issues raised in the course. Yet a typical "B" paper would not be appropriate for reading aloud in class because it mainly provides a summary or reiteration of ideas and information already covered in the readings and discussion, with no evidence of independent thought or synthesis. Other "B" papers give evidence of independent thought, but the argument is not presented clearly or convincingly.

 

C.      A typical "C" paper provides a less thorough or accurate summary of material presented in the course, or a less thorough defense of an argument.

 

D.      A paper that receives a grade less than "C" typically does not respond adequately to the assignment, is marred by frequent errors, unclear writing, poor organization, or some combination of those problems.