"Modern Ahabs in Texas: William O. Douglas and Lone
Star Conservation."
Journal of the West.
44 (Fall 2005): 39-46.
This essay explores the environmental
activism in which Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas participated in
Texas. Douglas confronted entrenched interests in Texas, as well as few
federal lands. He argued that unique environmental areas of Texas were the
heritage of all citizens and thus deserved federal
protection--since the state was doing such a poor job. Drawing a parallel with
the biblical parable of Ahab in Naboth's vineyard (I Kings, Chapter 21),
Douglas argued that special interests were squandering Texas' natural
inheritance. His book--Farewell to Texas: A Vanishing Wilderness--explored
these themes and brought much-needed attention to conservation fights in
Texas. In the end, it was his presence as a national figure that did the most
to help the issue, for he commanded attention. This essay is important in
showing the justice's adaptability to local circumstances in his
environmentalism.
"William O. Douglas: The Environmental Justice." In
The Human
Tradition in the American West, ed. Benson Tong and Regan Lutz, 155-170.
Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, Inc., 2001. This has been reprinted in
The Human
Tradition in American: 1865 to the Present, ed. Charles W. Calhoun,
301-316. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, Inc., 2003.
This essay provides an overview of
Justice William O. Douglas, arguing that he was a quintessential Westerner
capitalizing on images of rugged independence and the magnificent
out-of-doors. Douglas' Western-ness mattered to his political acceptability in
the New Deal, and he cultivated the image throughout his career. Although he
lived most of his life in the East, Douglas was a Westerner at heart and some
of his most important activism (e.g., protest hike against a road in
Washington's Olympic National Park) and judicial decisions (e.g.,
Udall v. FPC [1967], Sierra Club v. Morton [1972])
focused on Western lands. This essay furnishes a brief overview of Douglas,
reorienting scholarly attention away from his liberal judicial opinions and
civil libertarianism and toward his Western environmentalism.
"Administrative Trials, Environmental Consequences,
and the Use of History in Arizona's Tonto National Forest, 1926-1996."
Western Historical
Quarterly 31 (Summer 2000): 189-214.
Managers of the Tonto National Forest near
Phoenix, Arizona attempted to rehabilitate the range that had been decimated
by decades of ranching. Turning to the forest's environmental history as a
management tool, they hoped to rehabilitate the rangeland by approximating
past land-use patterns. However, history eventually became irrelevant as
recreationists from Phoenix, not traditional ranchers, became the dominant
forest users. This article contributes much to current historiography by
demonstrating attempts to rehabilitate rangelands. Moreover, it addresses a
central issue in modern Western history--the relationship between metropolitan
areas and their rural hinterlands.
"Spiritual Egalitarianism: John Muir's Religious
Environmentalism." In
John Muir in Historical Perspective, ed. Sally M. Miller, 123-136. New
York: Peter Lang Publishing, 1999.
This essay argues that John Muir--the
nineteenth-century preservationist--used his spirituality to shape his
environmental thinking. Rejecting notions of Christianity that posited a
hierarchical world with humans on top (i.e., anthropocentrism), Muir believed
instead that God created all the world equally and all creatures--indeed, all
creation--were equal spiritually. Additionally, it argues that this modified
Christian perspective formed relatively early in his life. This argument
contributes to the literature of Muir's religion by arguing that, although he
rejected certain elements of Christianity as practiced in the United States,
he nonetheless interpreted his environmentalism in religious and Christian
terms, which set the stage for much twentieth-century environmental thought.
"Reclamation, Ranching and Reservation:
Environmental, Cultural, and Governmental Rivalries in Transitional Arizona."
Journal of the Southwest
40 (Autumn 1998): 333-361.
This article explores the tensions between farmers
in the Salt River Valley, pastoralists on the Tonto range, and irrigationists
along the Salt and Verde Rivers in central Arizona. More specifically, it
examines competition between Phoenix farmers who wanted watershed protection
and the sheep and cattle ranchers in the Tonto rangeland, as well as the
competition between the sheep and cattle interests. What is revealed is that
settled farmers commanded greater political power and successfully argued for
the reservation of the Tonto region in a national forest and secured federal
funding for the Roosevelt Dam reclamation project. In addition, rivalries
between sheep and cattle ranchers demonstrated competing notions of property
and cultural values. In the end, the existence of all of these rival groups
exacerbated resource exploitation leading to a devastated environment. This
essay fits well within the Western environmental historiography showing how
culture, economy, and ecology interacted to decimate natural resources.
Moreover, it demonstrates the political power of urban and agricultural
boosters and the federal government in Western resource management.